Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kids Squad LLC v. Guangzhou hui de E-Trade Co., Ltd et al
as 1:2023cv07764
Plaintiff:
Kids Squad LLC
Defendant:
Guangzhou hui de E-Trade Co., Ltd, Guangzhou Yikong Electronic Commerce Co. Ltd., Shenzhen Shi Yanwu Zhineng Jiaju Youxian Gongsi Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1341 Patent Infringement
FUJIFILM North America Corporation v. Abesons Corp et al
as 1:2016cv05677
Defendant:
Abesons Corp, Avis Sales Corp., Big Value Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
FUJIFILM North America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Canon U.S.A. Inc. v. F & E Trading LLC et al
as 2:2015cv06015
Plaintiff:
Canon U.S.A. Inc.
Defendant:
F & E Trading LLC and Albert Houllou
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
E Trade Financial Corporation v. Marvasol, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02174
Plaintiff:
E Trade Financial Corporation
Defendant:
Marvasol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Converse, Inc. v. Fila U.S.A., Inc., et al
as 1:2014cv05989
Plaintiff:
Converse, Inc.
Defendant:
Fila U.S.A., Inc., and Fujian Xinya I&E Trading Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Droplets, Inc. v. E*Trade Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv02326
Plaintiff:
Droplets, Inc.
Defendant:
E*Trade Financial Corporation , E*Trade Securities, LLC , E*Trade Bank and others
Counter_claimant:
ETrade Financial Corporation , E*Trade Securities, LLC , ETRADE Bank and others
Counter_defendant:
Droplets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Technomarine SA v. E N E Trading Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv00633
Plaintiff:
Technomarine SA
Defendant:
E N E Trading Corp., Emil Mizrachi and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Cigmall et al
as 1:2007cv08135
Plaintiff:
Philip Morris USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Cigmall, Dmitriy Suvorov, Diana Bezede and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
