Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Mantel v. Remolacha LLC
as 1:2024cv03246
Plaintiff:
John Marshall Mantel
Defendant:
Remolacha LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. v. Bergdorf Goodman LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Amarte USA Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Bergdorf Goodman LLC, T.J. Maxx, Inc., Marshalls of MA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Mantel v. Peter Hamilton Consultants, Inc.
as 1:2023cv04274
Plaintiff:
John Marshall Mantel
Defendant:
Peter Hamilton Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
International Labels LLC v. Sportlife Brands LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11370
Defendant:
Burlington Stores, Inc., T.J. Maxx Inc., SPORTLIFE BRANDS LLC and others
Plaintiff:
International Labels LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Lee et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2019cv09220
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Belcalis Marlenis Almanzar, Russell James Chell, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee and Glen Keith DeMeritt, III
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Mantel v. Smash.com Inc.
as 6:2019cv06113
Defendant:
Smash.com Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Marshall Mantel
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Mantel v. Fever Labs, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00090
Defendant:
Fever Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Marshall Mantel
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
A&N Design Studio v. Rosenberg
as 1:2018cv11291
Defendant:
Marshal Rosenberg
Plaintiff:
A&N Design Studio d/b/a Door3 Business Applications and A&N Design Studio
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Mantel v. Artnet WorldWide Corporation
as 1:2018cv09828
Plaintiff:
John Marshall Mantel
Defendant:
Artnet WorldWide Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Rosenberg v. Metropolis Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04830
Plaintiff:
Marshal Rosenberg
Defendant:
Metropolis Group, Inc. , John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
