Cases 31 - 40 of 151
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00981
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv01336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ramos v. Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00958
Defendant:
Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC, Kirsten Bernheim, Bureaus Investment Group Portfolio No. 15, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Ramos
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv08233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ambalu v. Law Offices of Paul L. Marks, PLLC et al
as 7:2014cv05677
Plaintiff:
Aaron Ambalu
Defendant:
Law Offices of Paul L. Marks, PLLC , Paul L. Marks , Collection Bureau of the Hudson Valley, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Katz v. M.L. Zager, P.C. et al
as 7:2014cv03704
Plaintiff:
David Katz
Defendant:
M.L. Zager, P.C., Michael L. Zager, Joseph Loughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Babcock v. C. Tech Collections Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03124
Defendant:
James Argent, C. Tech Collections Inc., John and Jane Does Numbers 1 through 25 and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Babcock
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Friedman v. Dynia & Associates, LLC et al
as 7:2014cv01080
Plaintiff:
Varda Friedman
Defendant:
Dynia & Associates, LLC, Alfred S. Dynia, Anthony Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davidov v. Dynia & Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv07410
Defendant:
Anthony Crews, Crown Asset Management, LLC, Alfred S. Dynia and others
Plaintiff:
Igor Davidov
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
