Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Cropp v. Allen
as 1:2016cv08822
Plaintiff:
Nichole Cropp
Defendant:
Terry Allen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06312
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sturm et al v. The Keith Haring Foundation Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01582
Plaintiff:
Tami Sturm , Maxine Kobley , Dianne Duncan and others
Defendant:
The Keith Haring Foundation Inc. , The Estate of Keith Haring , Julia Gruen and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Federal Trade Commission v. Pinnacle Payment Services, LLC et al
as 1:2013mc00063
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Pinnacle Payment Services, LLC, Velocity Payment Solutions, LLC, Heritage Capital Services, LLC and others
Receiver:
Michael Fuqua
Penceal et al v. Empire Beauty School, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07572
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Penceal , Shireef Jones , Kristy Waldrip and others
Defendant:
Empire Beauty School, Inc., EEG Inc., EEG LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Green v. Island Partners,LLC et al
as 2:2013cv04462
Defendant:
Philip J. Bandolos, Davis & Prager, P.C., Larry Davis, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Green
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Green v. Islandia Partners, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv04362
Defendant:
Philip J. Bandalos, Larry Davis, Davis & Prager, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Green
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Valencia v. Nichols & Grant, LLC
as 1:2012cv01024
Plaintiff:
Jenifer Valencia
Defendant:
Nichols & Grant, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
