Cases 101 - 110 of 527
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00216
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Werzberger v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
as 7:2021cv00336
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Plaintiff:
Joel Werzberger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sandel v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv00343
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Simche Sandel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rottenberg v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00193
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Plaintiff:
Rivka Rottenberg
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ziegler v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv00264
Plaintiff:
Esther Ziegler
Defendant:
Midland Funding, LLC, John Does 1-25 and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Singer v. Forster & Garbus LLP et al
as 1:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Chava Singer
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Forster & Garbus LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Singer v. Forster & Garbus, LLP et al
as 7:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
Chava Singer
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Forster & Garbus, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stoessel v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv00049
Defendant:
John Does 1-25, Midland Funding LLC and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Chana Stoessel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06386
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gross v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv06389
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Leivy Gross
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
