Cases 131 - 140 of 202
Peay et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03850
Plaintiff:
Geneva Peay and John Stitt
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Matthews et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03542
Plaintiff:
Carmela Matthews and Wallace Matthews
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Montague v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03137
Plaintiff:
Pamela Montague
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Munroe et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03136
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Munroe and Lisa Munroe
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Spreeman et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02962
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Spreeman and Robert Spreeman, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Childress et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02963
Plaintiff:
James Childress and Kathy Childress
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McGrogan v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02728
Plaintiff:
Timothy McGrogan
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cannon v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02726
Plaintiff:
Mark Cannon
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McMillian v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02729
Plaintiff:
Gary McMillian
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Billingslea et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02681
Plaintiff:
Debra Billingslea and Arthur Billingslea
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
