Cases 141 - 150 of 157
Pomper v. Cohen & Slamowitz, LLP
as 7:2008cv00884
Plaintiff:
Alan J. Pomper
Defendant:
Cohen & Slamowitz, LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2008cv00261
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv05162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dubois v. Cohen & Slamowitz, LLP et al
as 1:2007cv07739
Plaintiff:
Anne A. Dubois
Defendant:
Cohen & Slamowitz, LLP, Metro Portfolios, Inc., J & E Process Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Odegaard v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv07572
Plaintiff:
Linda Odegaard
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc., Midland Funding LLC and Cohen & Slamowitz, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
