Cases 11 - 20 of 586
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DiNardo et al v. Republic of the Sudan
as 1:2023cv07328
Plaintiff:
Harley DiNardo, Pio DiNardo, Andrew Economos and others
Defendant:
Republic of the Sudan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Cicek v. Green Station Auto Services Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv05448
Plaintiff:
Yalcin Cicek
Defendant:
Green Station Auto Services Inc. and Wen Jian Huang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Zhuang v. Lucky Nail Spa, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv05118
Plaintiff:
Sai E Zhuang
Defendant:
Lucky Nail Spa, Inc., Jian Jian Han and Ronggai Yang
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
Zhuang v. Lucky Nail Spa, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05118
Plaintiff:
SAI E ZHUANG
Defendant:
LUCKY NAIL SPA, INC., JIAN JIAN HAN and RONGGAI YANG
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
