Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Torres
as 1:2015cv04872
Plaintiff:
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Italo Torres
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Pierce et al
as 1:2015cv02267
Plaintiff:
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Lucas Pierce, Volume Distribution, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Hovanissian et al
as 1:2014cv08973
Plaintiff:
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Armen Hovanissian and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Reed et al
as 1:2014cv07912
Plaintiff:
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Adam Reed, Driftstl LLC and "John Does" 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. De Carvalho et al
as 1:2014cv06954
Plaintiff:
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Nathan De Carvalho and "John Does" 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Murray et al
as 1:2014cv03658
Plaintiff:
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Joseph Murray and Jessica Rae Butcher-Murray
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Rolex Watch U.S.A, Inc. v. Bassalali
as 1:2014cv00710
Plaintiff:
Rolex Watch U.S.A, Inc.
Defendant:
Adam Bassalali
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc v. Ambusavage et al
as 1:2013cv03688
Plaintiff:
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc
Defendant:
William J. Ambusavage, Unknown Websites 1-10, Unknown Entities 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Rolex Deli Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv02567
Defendant:
Ali Mohamad and Rolex Deli Corp.
Plaintiff:
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Avery et al
as 1:2013cv00634
Plaintiff:
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Reginald Avery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
