Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 15 of 15
Tide Natural Gas Storage I, LP et al v. Falcon Gas Storage Company, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv05821
Plaintiff: Tide Natural Gas Storage I, LP and Tide Natural Gas Storage II, LP
Defendant: Falcon Gas Storage Company, Inc., Arcapita Bank B.S.C., Arcapita, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Tide Natural Gas Storage I, LP et al v. Falcon Gas Storage Company, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv05821
Plaintiff: Tide Natural Gas Storage I, LP and Tide Natural Gas Storage II, LP
Defendant: Falcon Gas Storage Company, Inc. , Arcapita Bank B.S.C. , Arcapita, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: Arcapita, Inc. , Falcon Gas Storage Company, Inc. and Arcapita Bank B.S.C.
Cross_defendant: HSBC Bank USA, National Association
Counter_claimant: Arcapita, Inc. , Falcon Gas Storage Company, Inc. and Arcapita Bank B.S.C.
Counter_defendant: Tide Natural Gas Storage I, LP and Tide Natural Gas Storage II, LP
Intervenor: John M. Hopper , Edmund A. Knolle , Jeffrey H. Foutch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Alleyne et al v. Time Moving & Storage Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01356
Plaintiff: Marcel Alleyne and Earl Legrandeo
Defendant: Time Moving & Storage Inc. and The Time Record Storage Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Perez et al v. Time Moving & Storage Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02775
Plaintiff: Edwin Perez, Edwin Perez, Javier Yangua and others
Defendant: Time Moving & Storage Inc., The Time Record Storage Company, LLC, Hyperion Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
McIntosh et al v. Time Moving & Storage Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02226
Plaintiff: Stanley McIntosh, Rahamut Shah and Claude Eastman
Defendant: Time Moving & Storage Inc. and Time Record Storage Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?