Cases 21 - 30 of 2,397
Anderson v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06142
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrea v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06145
Plaintiff:
John Andrea
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anemone v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06148
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anemone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bader v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06149
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Esther Bader
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berkowitz v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06150
Plaintiff:
Jerome Berkowitz
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bernet v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06152
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bernet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Binder v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06153
Plaintiff:
Irwin Binder
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonizzi v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06154
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Diane L. Bonizzi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Case v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06156
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Case
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06157
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Jayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
