Cases 31 - 40 of 1,482
Florance v. Broome County et al
as 9:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Thomas Florance
Defendant:
Broome County, Frederick J. Akshar, Robert Charpinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
County of Monroe v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 7:2024cv02962
Plaintiff:
County of Monroe
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Olsen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Frederick James Olsen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
United States of America v. Knapp
as 24-913
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FREDERICK ELI KNAPP
Apkaki v. Proguard Protection Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02687
Plaintiff:
Frederick Apkaki
Defendant:
Proguard Protection Inc., Robert Hall and Richard Stanley
Frederick v. Uhler
as 1:2024cv02513
Plaintiff:
Marquise Frederick
Defendant:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whelan, Jr. et al v. Gerson Lehrman Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02202
Plaintiff:
Frederick F Whelan, Jr., Douglas R Emerick and Jason Albert
Defendant:
Gerson Lehrman Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Frederick v. Uhler
as 9:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
Marquise Frederick
Respondent:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gross v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv01722
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gross
Defendant:
James C Johnson and County of Suffolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. U.S.A.
as 1:2024cv01626
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Frederick
Defendant:
U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
