Cases 81 - 90 of 1,904
Bernet v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06152
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bernet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Binder v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06153
Plaintiff:
Irwin Binder
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonizzi v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06154
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Diane L. Bonizzi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Case v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06156
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Case
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06157
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Jayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zarosl v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06158
Plaintiff:
Matthew Zarosl
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conroy v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06159
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Conroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Croce v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06160
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., McKesson Corporation and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Salvatore Croce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yasso v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06162
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Yasso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dakers v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06163
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Dakers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
