Cases 81 - 90 of 94
Chao v. M & M Automotive Unlimited Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01077
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
M & M Automotive Unlimited Inc. and Peter Macris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chao v. Giant Big Apple Beer LTD et al
as 1:2007cv01103
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao and Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
Giant Big Apple Beer LTD and Sunny Paek
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chao v. Staff Blue
as 1:2007cv01142
Plaintiff:
Elaine L Chao and Elaine L Chao
Defendant:
Staff Blue
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chao v. Local 1102, Communications Workers of America
as 1:2007cv00743
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
Local 1102, Communications Workers of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
Chao v. Ranchito Salvadoreno et al
as 1:2007cv00717
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
Ranchito Salvadoreno and Elena Barcenas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chao v. Sabe Restaurant 401(k) Plan
as 1:2007cv00758
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
Sabe Restaurant 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Chao v. 717 Fifth Avenue Gourmet Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv00757
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
717 Fifth Avenue Gourmet Corp., New Blue Flowers Gourmet, Inc., Byung N. Lee and others
Counter Claimant:
Byung N. Lee
Counter Defendant:
Elaine L. Chao
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Chao v. Sabe Restaurant 401(k) Plan
as 1:2007cv00758
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
Sabe Restaurant 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Chao v. Sabe Restaurant 401(k) Plan
as 2:2007cv00758
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
Sabe Restaurant 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Chao v. Constantopoulos
as 2:2007cv00349
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao and Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
Guy Constantopoulos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
