Cases 81 - 85 of 85
Miranda et al v. Abex Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv05509
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Miranda and Diana Miranda
Defendant:
Abex Corporation, American Refractories, Inc., Anchor Packing Company and others
Cross Claimant:
GE Aviation Systems LLC and Texas Instruments Incorporated
Cross Defendant:
Bondex Incorporated, Boeing Integrated Defense Systems, Borg Warner Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miranda et al v. Abex Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv04231
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Miranda and Diana Miranda
Defendant:
Abex Corporation, Alcoa, Inc., American Refractories, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
The Boeing Company and Nasco Air Brakes, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Avocet Enterprises, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Co., Inc., Bondex Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Campbell Lodging, Inc. v. United Technologies Corporation
as 1:2005cv03676
Plaintiff:
Campbell Lodging, Inc.
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation, Otis Elevator Company, Kone Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 at Fed. Question: Anti-trust
In Re: Elevator and Escalator Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2004md01644
Plaintiff:
Transhorn, Ltd., Transhorn, Ltd., Transhorn, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation, Otis Elevator Company, Otis Elevator Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In re Elevator Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2004cv01178
Plaintiff:
Transhorn, Ltd., Transhorn, Ltd., Transhorn, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation, United Technologies Corporation, United Technologies Corporation and others
Intervenor:
Riverbay Corporation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
1775 Housing Associates, 1775 Housing Associates, 1775 Housing Associates and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Elevator Capital Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
