Cases 131 - 140 of 1,841
In Re: Request from Argentina
as 1:2023mc00147
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Sandra Ines Gerchunoff, DESPEGAR.COM.AR S.A. and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In re: Salesforce, Inc.
as 1:2023mc00027
Petitioner:
Salesforce, Inc.
Respondent:
WSOU Holdings, LLC and WSOU Capital Partners LLC
Yida Gao et al v. Struck et al
as 1:2023mc00086
Petitioner:
Yida Gao, Sand Hill Advisors PR LLC and Shima Capital Management LLC
Respondent:
Adam Struck doing business as Struck Capital Management LLC and Struck Capital Management LLC
In Re: Letter of Request from Mexico
as 1:2023mc00125
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Luis Fernando Lozano Villarreal and Sandra Alicia Trevino Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In Re: Request from Japan and/or Vietnam
as 1:2023mc00077
Petitioner:
Shueisha Inc., Shogakukan Inc., KADOKAWA CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
GoDaddy.com, LLC and eNom, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
New York Packaging II LLC v. AT&T
as 1:2023mc00028
Petitioner:
New York Packaging II LLC doing business as RediBag USA
Respondent:
AT&T
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Brisco et al
as 1:2023mc00085
Defendant:
Fredirick Safranko, Marcus Todd Brisco, Yas Cutellum LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
In re: General Manufacturing Industries, LLC
as 1:2022mc00596
Petitioner:
Evanston Insurance Company
Respondent:
General Manufacturing Industries, LLC
In Re: Request from The Cayman Islands
as 1:2023mc00043
Respondent:
Kroll, LLC, Kroll Securities, LLC, Duff & Phelps, LLC and others
Petitioner:
507 Summit LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
