Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Cephalon Inc. v. Hospira Inc.
as 1:2014cv01242
Plaintiff:
Cephalon Inc.
Defendant:
Hospira Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Hospira Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Cephalon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hospira Inc. et al v. Ben Venue Laboratories Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01008
Plaintiff:
Hospira Inc. and Orion Corporation
Defendant:
Ben Venue Laboratories Inc. , Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC and West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Hospira Inc.
as 1:2014cv00915
Plaintiff:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Defendant:
Hospira Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Hospira Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hospira Inc. et al v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. et al
as 1:2014cv00486
Plaintiff:
Hospira Inc. and Orion Corporation
Defendant:
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. and Aurobindo Pharma USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hospira Inc. et al v. Actavis LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00488
Plaintiff:
Hospira Inc. and Orion Corporation
Defendant:
Actavis US Holding LLC and Actavis LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hospira Inc. et al v. Ben Venue Laboratories Inc.
as 1:2014cv00487
Plaintiff:
Hospira Inc. and Orion Corporation
Defendant:
Ben Venue Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cephalon Inc. v. Hospira Inc.
as 1:2013cv02094
Plaintiff:
Cephalon Inc.
Defendant:
Hospira Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hospira Inc. v. B. Braun Medical Inc.
as 1:2013cv00819
Plaintiff:
Hospira Inc.
Defendant:
B. Braun Medical Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Data Carriers LLC v. Hospira Inc.
as 1:2013cv00789
Plaintiff:
Data Carriers LLC
Defendant:
Hospira Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Rydex Technologies LLC v. Hospira Inc.
as 1:2013cv00668
Plaintiff:
Rydex Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Hospira Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
