Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Shasheva v. Genomic Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01942
Defendant:
Geoffrey M. Parker, Kimberly Popovits, Fred Cohen and others
Plaintiff:
Anna Shasheva
Roam-Tel Partners et al v. AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC
as 1:2019cv01889
Plaintiff:
Jeri A. Fox, C.K.M.L. Partnership, Daniel A. Walz and others
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC
Intervenor:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plumley v. Genomic Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01719
Defendant:
Geoffrey M. Parker, Kimberly Popovits, Spring Acquisition Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Graham v. Condor Hospitality Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01552
Defendant:
Noah Davis, Condor Hospitality Trust, Inc., NHT Operating Partnership II, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
William Graham
Tang v. MINDBODY, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00210
Plaintiff:
Hyun Tang
Defendant:
Cipora Herman, Court Cunningham, Graham Smith and others
Sabatini v. MINDBODY Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00138
Plaintiff:
Eric Sabatini
Defendant:
Adam Miller, Cipora Herman, Graham Smith and others
Ranganathan v. Wildhorse Resource Development Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00015
Defendant:
Tony R. Weber, Scott A. Gieselman, Jay C. Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Suryanarayanan Ranganathan
Rosenblatt v. WildHorse Resource Development Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00022
Defendant:
Tony R. Weber, Jay C. Graham, Anthony Bahr and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Johnson v. Real and personal property of Next-Gen, Inc. et al., in the District of Delaware
as 1:2018mc00240
Defendant:
Next-Gen, Inc., AOSR Corporation, Kevin R. Brandes and others
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri, Federal Trade Commission and Eric L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Parshall v. First BancTrust Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00218
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
First BancTrust Corporation , Jack R. Franklin , James D. Motley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
