Cases 11 - 20 of 22
E Credit Express, Inc. v. AutoFi, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00290
Defendant:
AutoFi, Inc.
Plaintiff:
E Credit Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Galbreath, Jr. v. Comeaux et al
as 1:2017cv00820
Plaintiff:
James T. Galbreath, Jr.
Defendant:
Patrick A. Comeaux and Western Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moon Express Inc. v. Intuitive Machines LLC
as 1:2016cv00344
Plaintiff:
Moon Express Inc.
Defendant:
Intuitive Machines LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00022
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Samuels et al v. Western Express Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00971
Plaintiff:
Devin Samuels and Taganyika Samuels
Defendant:
Western Express Inc. and Andrew Lynn Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alostar Bank of Commerce v. Airnet Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2014mc00025
Plaintiff:
Alostar Bank of Commerce
Defendant:
Airnet Holdings Inc., Airnet Management Inc., Airnet Systems Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Interpool Inc. v. 828 Express Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02045
Plaintiff:
Interpool Inc.
Defendant:
828 Express Inc.
Garnishee:
American President Lines Ltd., American President Lines Agencies Ltd., CMA CGM Logistics USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Eclipse IP LLC v. PetMed Express Inc.
as 1:2013cv01372
Plaintiff:
Eclipse IP LLC
Defendant:
PetMed Express Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Johnson v. Ace Cash Express Inc.
as 1:2013cv01186
Plaintiff:
Rosalyn Johnson
Defendant:
Ace Cash Express Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Mobile Logistics LLC v. Arctic Express Inc.
as 1:2012cv01012
Plaintiff:
Mobile Logistics LLC
Defendant:
Arctic Express Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
