Cases 21 - 30 of 170
USA v. Bennie Campbell
as 21-1601
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BENNIE CAMPBELL, aka David Matlock
Allen Campbell v. Egidijus Marcinkevicius
as 21-3871
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN F. CAMPBELL
Defendant / Appellee:
EGIDIJUS MARCINKEVICIUS
Kathleen Pethtel, et al v. TN Dept of Children's Servs, et al
as 21-5864
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHLEEN ELAINE PETHTEL, individually and as next friend to M.M.P., C.L.P., K.D.P., E.L.P., S.A.P., A.E.P., and N.A.P. and TOBIAS MARK PETHTEL, individually and as next friend to M.M.P., C.L.P., K.D.P., E.L.P., S.A.P., A.E.P., and N.A.P.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES, ANDERSON COUNTY CASA, ANDERSON COUNTY, TN SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Dale Morris v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 21-2901
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DALE LESTER MORRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC, Director of, CARMAN MACINTIRE, Chief Medical Office and SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden
In re: Maximo Sandoval, Jr.
as 21-2773
Petitioner:
In re: MAXIMO SANDOVAL, JR.
Respondent:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden
Dana Campbell v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins
as 21-5651
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DANA CAMPBELL
Defendant / Appellant:
HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, dba The Hartford
Grow Michigan, LLC v. LT Lender, LLC, et al
as 21-2673
Defendant / Appellee:
LT LENDER, LLC, DAMIAN KASSAB, PAUL SHAMO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GROW MICHIGAN, LLC
Anthony Spencer v. Sherman Campbell
as 21-2610
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY SPENCER and ANTHONY CHRISTOPHER SPENCER
Respondent / Appellee:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden
USA v. Adam Campbell
as 21-1493
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAM WAYNE CAMPBELL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Billy Bennett v. Sherman Campbell
as 21-1486
Petitioner / Appellant:
BILLY JOE BENNETT
Respondent / Appellee:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
