Cases 31 - 40 of 228
Derrick SmithIn re: Derrick Smith
as 21-1671
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK LEE SMITH
Respondent:
JAMES R. SCHIEBNER, Warden, et al
Derrick SmithIn re: Derrick Smith
as 21-1674
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK LEE SMITH
Respondent:
UNKNOWN PARTY #1, et al
Derrick Gibbs v. Hamilton Cnty, OH Sheriff's, et al
as 21-3965
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK GIBBS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAMILTON COUNTY, OH SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SHERIFF OFFICER CRAWFORD, SHERIFF OFFICER ELLIOTT and others
Derrick Smith v. James Schiebner
as 21-1638
Petitioner / Appellant:
DERRICK LEE SMITH, named as Derrick Lee Cardello-Smith and all 37,000 prisoners that are currently/similarly situated, aka Derrick Lee Cardello Smith
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES R. SCHIEBNER, Warden
Derrick SmithIn re: Derrick Smith
as 21-1595
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK LEE SMITH
Respondent:
JAMES R. SCHIEBNER
Derrick Sweeting v. Ronald Erdos, et al
as 21-3875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK SWEETING
Defendant:
RONALD ERDOS, Warden, LARRY GREENE and INSPECTOR LINNEA MAHLMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER WESLEY WELCH and CHIEF INSPECTOR ASSISTANT HANYIDA
Derrick Sweeting v. Ronald Erdos
as 21-3868
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK SWEETING
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD ERDOS, Warden
Derrick SmithIn re: Derrick Smith
as 21-2971
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK LEE SMITH
Respondent:
JAMES R. SCHIEBNER
Daniel Scouten, et al v. Midland County Jail, et al
as 21-2953
Plaintiff:
DANIEL N. SCOUTEN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORY O'DELL DERRICK
Defendant:
MIDLAND COUNTY, MI JAIL
Defendant / Appellee:
MIDLAND COUNTY, MI and ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC.
Christopher North, et al v. Gayle Scanlon, et al
as 21-2870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER NORTH
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA THOMPSON, sender of mail/legal mail and DERRICK LEE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
GAYLE SCANLON, GOA-Mailroom Clerk, K. BROWN, GOA-Mailroom Clerk, L. BARNES, Grievance Coordinator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
