Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Miguel Ramos v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-3788
Petitioner:
MIGUEL RAMOS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Miguel Ramos v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-3325
Petitioner:
MIGUEL RAMOS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
USA v. Antonio Garcia
as 10-1351
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONIO RAMOS GARCIA
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
Guilebaldo Sanchez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-3866
Petitioner:
GUILEBALDO RAMOS SANCHEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
USA v. Jesus Ramos
as 09-1458
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS RAMOS
Edwin Torres-Ramos v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-3334
Petitioner:
EDWIN ARNULFO TORRES-RAMOS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Leticia Ramos, et al v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-3112
Petitioner:
LETICIA RAMOS and SANTIAGO RAMOS
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
USA v. Torres-Ramos
as 06-3580
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CIRILO TORRES-RAMOS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
