Cases 41 - 50 of 56
DeAndre Hopson v. Ruth Spencer, et al
as 13-5571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEANDRE HOPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RUTH SPENCER, COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Brooks Mauldin v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 13-1151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BROOKS L. MAULDIN
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
American Civil Liberties Union v. FBI, et al
as 12-2536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MICHIGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Brooks Mauldin v. DOJ
as 12-2412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BROOKS L. MAULDIN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Margy Temponeras v. United States Department of Ju
as 12-4140
Petitioner:
MARGY TEMPONERAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Michael Rimmer v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 11-6286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DALE RIMMER
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Richard Convertino, et al v. DOJ
as 11-1787
Plaintiff:
RICHARD G. CONVERTINO
Appellant:
DAVID ASHENFELTER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Franklin Shaffer v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 10-5648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN DEWEY SHAFFER, dba Rebel Pawn Shop
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES
Sam Thomas v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 09-2034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAM THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
