Cases 81 - 90 of 223
Likisha Clark v. City of Memphis, TN, et al
as 19-6430
Defendant / Appellee:
GARRETT O'BRIEN, individually, and in his capacity as an officer of the Memphis Police Department, CITY OF MEMPHIS, TN, JON ALSUP, individually, and in his capacity as an officer of the Memphis Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIKISHA CLARK
Roger Lyles v. Darnell Jackson, et al
as 20-1042
Defendant / Appellee:
M. WALTERS, Quarter-Master supervisor, ROBERT KACZMAREK, Saginaw County Prosecutor, KATHLEEN DAVISON HUNTER, Assistant Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER L. LYLES
USA v. Silky Clark
as 20-5025
Defendant / Appellant:
SILKY KENNETH CLARK
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Salami v. Chippewa Corr Facility, et al
as 19-2248
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, MDOC Sergeant - URF, UNKNOWN PARTY, Marquette Unit ARUS and JEFFREY A. CLARK, ARUS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MOHAMMED SALAMI
Defendant:
CHIPPEWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Leda Reed v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 19-2213
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBIN CARVER, TRACEY MORENO and ERIC CARTHAN
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEDA D. REED, as Personal Representative of Estate of Anthony Demone Clark-Reed
In re: Bruce Reliford
as 19-6314
Petitioner:
In re: BRUCE CLARK RELIFORD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Joe Mitchell v. Kevin Genovese
as 19-6070
Respondent / Appellee:
KEVIN GENOVESE, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOE CLARK MITCHELL
Ardale Clark v. J. Terris
as 19-2150
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARDALE CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
J. A. TERRIS, Warden
Demetrius Clark v. Sherman Campbell
as 19-2049
Respondent / Appellee:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS DARELL CLARK
Quinton Roath v. William B. Lee, et al
as 19-6072
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK MORGAN, JEFF LONG, WILLIAM B. LEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTON M. ROATH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
