Cases 1 - 10 of 21
USA v. Brandon Sharp
as 22-3569
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANDON J. SHARP
USA v. Kenneth Sharp
as 22-3214
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH SHARP
USA v. Anthony Sharp
as 22-3125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY SHARP
USA v. Ronald Sharp
as 21-3828
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD SHARP
Michelle Hammond-Beville v. Jeff Landis, et al
as 21-5498
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHELLE HAMMOND-BEVILLE
Defendant / Appellant:
RON CARTER, JASON SHARPE and KATHY MORANTE
Defendant:
JEFF LANDIS and CHEATHAM COUNTY, TN
Latausha Simmons v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 21-1134
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, SOUTHFIELD, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, [UNKNOWN] CURRY, Detroit Police CAT Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATAUSHA SIMMONS
Kevin French v. Paul Harris, et al
as 20-5663
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL HARRIS, et al, BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, BENJAMIN MANUEL RUSS, Post Conviction Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN L. FRENCH
Michael Powell v. MDOC, et al
as 20-1032
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] CHAPMAN, Psychologist, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES) #1, named as John Doe 1; Mental Health Unit Chief for Chippewa, THOMAS OSIER, Mental Health Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEON POWELL
Robert Rolston, et al v. TN, et al
as 19-6309
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM J. FAIMON, PATTI MCNANEY, ROSEMARY DUCKLO SEXTON, District Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ROLSTON and CATHERINE R. DUNLAP-ROLSTON
Defendant:
STATE OF TENNESSEE GOVERNMENT
Andre Brown v. Terry Mackay, et al
as 19-1569
Defendant / Appellee:
T. BALL, Warden, TERRY MACKAY, Lieutenant, L. SHARP, Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE C. BROWN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
