Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Nigel Carroll v. Eric Holder
as 07-4242
Petitioner:
NIGEL PETER CARROLL
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Threap Thap v. Mukasey
as 07-4168
Petitioner:
THREAP THAP
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Shan Zhao v. Eric Holder
as 07-4117
Petitioner:
SHAN SHENG ZHAO
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Ibrahim Koussan v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
as 07-4107
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER, IMMIGRATION CLINIC OF THE UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY and others
Petitioner:
IBRAHIM ALI KOUSSAN
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Papa Ba v. Mukasey
as 07-4099
Petitioner:
PAPA AMADOU BA
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General, PETER D. KEISLER and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Ahmed Ould Habib Ramdane v. Mukasey
as 07-4064
Petitioner:
AHMED OULD HABIB RAMDANE
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Hui Wang v. Michael Mukasey
as 07-4038
Petitioner:
HUI YAN WANG
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Alognon v. Mukasey
as 07-4003
Petitioner:
TIMOTHE ALOGNON and AMEZANDO ADAKO
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Lin v. Mukasey
as 07-3988
Petitioner:
YU LIN
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Lam v. Mukasey
as 07-3976
Petitioner:
ABDOULAYE LAM
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.