Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Sheri Baker, et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., et al
as 14-5842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERI L. BAKER, aka Sheri Jones and DERYL L. BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., successor by merger to Chase Manhattan Morgage Corp. and successor by merger to Chase Home Finance, LLC, MERSCORP, Collectively as MERS and PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE INC.
Defendant:
CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, et. al.
GMAC Mortgage LLC, et al v. J. Rogan
as 11-6121
Debtor:
In re: ELIZABETH R. COLLINS
Appellee:
J. JAMES ROGAN
Appellant:
GMAC MORTGAGE LLC and CITIBANK, NA
:
LITTON LOAN SERVICING, L.P., THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, fka The Bank of New York as Successor to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the Benefit of the Certificate Holders of Popular, ABS, Inc. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2005-3 and AIG FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., et al v. J. Rogan
as 11-6075
Debtor:
In re: ELIZABETH R. COLLINS
Appellee:
J. JAMES ROGAN
Appellant:
LITTON LOAN SERVICING, L.P. and THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, fka The Bank of New York as Successor to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the Benefit of the Certificate Holders of Popular, ABS, Inc. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2005-3
:
AIG FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK and GMAC MORTGAGE LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-6514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carol Metz, et al v. Unizan Bank, et al
as 09-3751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL METZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIZAN BANK, itself and as corporate successor by merger of FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ZANESVILLE and COUNTY SAVINGS BANK, FIFTH THIRD BANK, itself and as corporate successor by merger of STRONGSVILLE SAVINGS BANK, WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., itself and as corporate successor by merger of FIRST UNITED BANK; FIRST UNITED BANCORP; FIRST UNION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
