Cases 1 - 10 of 171
Ruth Cooper v. Neilmed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 24-3198
Plaintiff:
RUTH ANN COOPER, DPM, individually and as the representative of a class of similary-situated persons
Defendant:
NEILMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Ruth Cooper v. Neilmed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 24-3199
Plaintiff:
RUTH ANN COOPER, DPM, individually and as the representative of a class of similary-situated persons
Defendant:
NEILMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant:
VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor:
TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Corey Lea, et al v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, et al
as 23-5169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY LEA, SFE LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY, INC., WILLIE CHARLES KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and DOROTHY WISE
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary of Agriculture, ZACH DUCHENEAUX, FSA Administrator and others
Raphael Person, Jr.In re: Raphael Person, Jr.
as 23-3063
Petitioner:
In re: RAPHAEL D. PERSON, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Eric Sabree, et al
as 22-0111
Petitioner:
In re: ERIC R. SABREE, in his official and personal capacity, WAYNE COUNTY, MI BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, also sometimes known as Charter County of Wayne by its Board of Commissioners and OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Respondent:
TONYA BOWLES, for herself and all those similarly situated, BRUCE TAYLOR, for herself and all those similarly situated, BRUCE TAYLOR, for himself and all those similarly situated and others
Coty Lewis v. Acuity Real Estate Services, LLC, et al
as 22-1406
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COTY LEWIS, Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons
Defendant / Appellee:
ACUITY REAL ESTATE SERVICES, LLC and KEVIN STUTEVILLE
3M Company, et alIn re: 3M Company, et al
as 22-305
Petitioner:
In re: 3M COMPANY, DYNEON, LLC, E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court:
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY C-8 PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION
Respondent:
KEVIN D. HARDWICK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
