Cases 1 - 10 of 761
Patrick ShankIn re: Patrick Shank
as 24-3509
Petitioner:
In re: PATRICK J. SHANK
Respondent:
SHELBIE SMITH, Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
In re: Patrick Shank
as 24-3501
Petitioner:
In re: PATRICK J. SHANK
Respondent:
SHELBIE SMITH, Warden
John Smith, Jr.In re: John Smith, Jr.
as 24-1475
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN SMITH, JR.
Respondent:
KIM CARGOR, Warden
Attica Scott, et alIn re: Attica Scott, et al
as 24-501
Petitioner:
In re: ATTICA SCOTT, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, CORBIN SMITH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, KAYLA MEISNER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY METRO GOVERNMENT, GREG FISCHER, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of Louisville, KY, ROBERT SCHROEDER, individually and in his official capacity as Interim Chief of the Louisville Metropolitan Police Department and others
C-Ville Fabricating, Inc., et al v. Joshua Tarter, et al
as 24-5324
Plaintiff:
C-VILLE FABRICATING, INC., dba Tarter Industries and ANNA LOU TARTER SMITH, individually and on behalf of Fabricating, Inc., dba Tarter Industries, dba Tarter Management Company, Inc., dba Tarter Gate Company, LLC, dba Tarter Tube, LLC
Defendant:
JOSHUA DONALD TARTER, THOMAS LEWIS GREGORY and HONG KONG QMC INDUSTRY COMPANY, LTD.
Brian Davis, et al v. Lucinda Baier, et al
as 24-5147
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DAVIS, derivatively on behalf of Brookdale Senior Living Inc., ROBERT BAZINET, derivatively on behalf of Brookdale Senior Living Inc. and BRIAN BICKETT, derivatively on behalf of Brookdale Senior Living Inc.
Defendant:
LUCINDA M. BAIER, T. ANDREW SMITH, STEVEN E. SWAIN and others
James SmithIn re: James Smith
as 24-1103
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES GABRIEL SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Dennie Smith
as 23-6071
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DENNIE A. SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
