Cases 1 - 10 of 11
John James, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, et al
as 24-3275
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. JAMES, AARON TIFFANY and CHRISTOPHER KOPF
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, aka Norfolk Southern Corporation, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, Independently, or as part of controlling or parent entity or agent/and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN NORFOLK SOUTHERN NORTHERN LINES/CF&E GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, originally named as Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment and others
John James, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co, et al
as 21-4155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN A. JAMES, AARON TIFFANY and CHRISTOPHER KOPF
Defendant / Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, aka Norfolk Southern Corporation, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, Independently, or as part of controlling or parent entity or agent/and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN NORFOLK SOUTHERN NORTHERN LINES/CF&E GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, originally named as Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment and others
John James, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Comp, et al
as 20-3281
Defendant / Appellee:
BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN NORFOLK SOUTHERN NORTHERN LINES/CF&E GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, originally named as Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment, DAVID N. RAY, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, Independently, or as part of controlling or parent entity or agent/and International Brotherhood of Teamsters and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN A. JAMES, CHRISTOPHER KOPF and AARON TIFFANY
Tina Vance, et al v. Amazon.Com., Inc
as 16-5533
:
In re: AMAZON.COM, INC., Fulfillment Center Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and Wage and Hour Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TINA VANCE, on behalf of herself and All Others Similarly Situated and AARON VANCE, on behalf of himself and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM.KYDC, INC., AMAZON.COM.KYDC, LLC and others
Jon Misewicz, et al v. City of Memphis, Tennessee
as 14-5053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JON MISEWICZ, MICHAEL ALBERSON, JR., MARTINAS ANDREWS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE
Jon Misewicz, et al v. City of Memphis, Tennessee
as 14-5052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALBERSON, JR., MARTINAS ANDREWS, MYRON D. APPLEWHITE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE
Marla Aaron v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 11-3650
Defendant / Appellee:
NOBLE GROHE, individually and as union representative for International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and Local 1216, UAW, JERARD COIFFARD, individually and as union representative for International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and Local 1216, UAW, MICHAEL MILLER, individually and as local president for International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and Local 1216, UAW and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARLA J. AARON
Marla Aaron v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 11-3650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLA J. AARON
Defendant - Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 1216, UNITED AUTO WORKER'S UNION and others
David White v. David Black, et al
as 10-3726
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID WHITE, et al.
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID HOLMER BLACK, EDWARD R. MOSS, AARON BURR and others
Badria Petros v. Meijer Great Lakes Limited Par, et al
as 09-1258
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BADRIA PETROS
Defendant - Appellant:
MEIJER GREAT LAKES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, JANICE STOTHERS, AARON MASSEL and others
Defendant:
REBECCA WILLIS and JON-JAY ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
