Cases 11 - 20 of 31
James Neaton v. Hartford Life and Accident
as 15-5392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES NEATON
Defendant - Appellee:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Roger Hunt v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins. Co.
as 14-3415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER A. HUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Arlys Williams v. Target Corporation, et al
as 13-2410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARLYS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
TARGET CORPORATION, fka Dayton Hudson Corp, EXECUTIVE LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN and HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Brian Logsdon v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins, et al
as 13-3939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN LOGSDON
Defendant - Appellee:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and O.E. MEYER COMPANY, INC.
Mary Dent v. Hartford Life & Accident Insur
as 12-3830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY DENT
Defendant - Appellee:
HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Gary Lingo v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins, et al
as 11-3992
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY L. LINGO
Defendant - Appellee:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and US BANK GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
James Neaton v. Hartford Life and Accident In
as 11-6061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES NEATON
Defendant - Appellee:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Vicki Peery v. Hartford Life and Accident In
as 11-5532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICKI C. PEERY
Defendant - Appellee:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Barry Trantham v. Hartford Life & Accident
as 11-1064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY TRANTHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Phillip Hernandez, et al v. Hartford Life Group Insurance
as 10-2377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP HERNANDEZ, Individually and as Conservator of the Estate of G.H., a minor and ESTATE OF G.H., A Minor
Defendant - Appellee:
HARTFORD LIFE GROUP INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
