Cases 31 - 40 of 88
Univ Life Church Monastery, et al v. Wayne Nabors, et al
as 21-5048
Defendant:
WAYNE NABORS, in his official capacity as County Clerk of Putnam County, TN
Defendant / Appellant:
HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Tennessee, JENNINGS H. JONES, in his official capacity as District Attorney General for Rutherford County, TN, KIM R. HELPER, in her official capacity as District Attorney General for Rutherford County, TN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TIMEAKA FARRIS, a married couple, JAMES WELCH, an individual, ERIN PATTERSON, an individual and others
Gabriel Schaaf v. Tim Shoop
as 21-3024
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM SHOOP, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
GABRIEL SCHAAF
USA v. James Smith
as 20-2276
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES GABRIEL SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mirian Zelaya-Martinez, et al v. Jeffrey Rosen
as 20-4311
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
GABRIEL FERNANDO SIERRA-ZELAYA and MIRIAN YAMILETH ZELAYA-MARTINEZ
James SmithIn re: James Smith
as 20-2206
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES GABRIEL SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jerome Hailey v. Michael Trombley, et al
as 20-1631
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL TROMBLEY, Correctional Officer and GABRIEL NOBLE, Correctional Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME MENDELL HAILEY
Gustavo Orozco-Gabriel v. William Barr
as 20-3508
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
GUSTAVO RENE OROZCO-GABRIEL
Dish Network LLC, et al v. Gabriel Matos, et al
as 20-3065
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NAGRASTAR LLC and DISH NETWORK LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
GABRIEL A MATOS, JR. and GABRIEL MATOS
Ingrid Gabriel Ambrocio v. William Barr
as 19-4246
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
INGRID GABRIEL AMBROCIO
In re: James Smith
as 19-2415
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES GABRIEL SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
