Cases 31 - 40 of 116
Bd Of Trustees Plumbing, et al v. Susan Humbert, et al
as 17-3394
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS, PIPE FITTERS & MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SERVICE, LOCAL UNION NO. 392 PENSION FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS, PIPE FITTERS & MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SERVICE, LOCAL UNION NO. 392 SUB FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS, PIPE FITTERS & MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SERVICE, LOCAL UNION NO. 392 EDUCATION TRUST FUND and others
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
GENESIS MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC. and STEVE REECE, dba Genesis Mechanical Services
Defendant:
SUSAN L. HUMBERT, dba Genesis Mechanical Services and STEVEN L. HUMBERT, dba Genesis Mechanical Services
Plumbers and Pipe Fitters Natl, et al v. Michael Burns, et al
as 16-4764
Movant - Appellant:
JEFF M. BROWN
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PLUMBERS AND PIPE FITTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND, SEIU PENSION PLANS MASTER TRUST and WEST VIRGINIA LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. BURNS and ROBERT C. RICHTER
Stevens Engrs & Constr, Inc. v. Local 17 Iron Workers Pension, et al
as 16-4098
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVENS ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
LOCAL 17 IRON WORKERS PENSION FUND and LOCAL 17 IRON WORKERS PENSION FUND BD OF TRUSTEES
Local 17 Iron Workers Pension, et al v. Stevens Engrs & Constr, Inc.
as 16-4099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOCAL 17 IRON WORKERS PENSION FUND and LOCAL 17 IRON WORKERS PENSION FUND BD OF TRUSTEES
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVENS ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
Raymond Orrand, et al v. Hunt Construction Group, Inc., et al
as 16-3822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND ORRAND, Administrator of the Ohio Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Plan, Ohio Operating Engineers Pension Fund, Ohio Operating Engineers Apprenticeship Fund, Ohio Operating Engineers Education & Safety Fund and TRUSTEES OF THE OHIO OPERATING ENGINEERS HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN, OHIO OPERATING ENGINEERS PENSION FUND, OHIO OPERATING ENGINEERS APPRENTICESHIP FUND, OHIO OPERATING ENGINEERS EDUCATION & SAFETY FUND
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNT CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC., DONLEY'S INC., CLEVELAND CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC., dba Cleveland Cement Contractors, Inc. and others
Norfolk Cnty Retirement System, et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc, et al
as 16-6059
Plaintiff:
NORFOLK COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, et al.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, NEW YORK CITY TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, NEW YORK CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT PENSION FUND and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., WAYNE T. SMITH and W. LARRY CASH
G. Ruff v. Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacc, et al
as 16-3624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
G. THOMAS RUFF
Defendant - Appellee:
BAKERY, CONFECTIONERY, TOBACCO WORKERS & GRAIN MILLERS & INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL, BAKERY & CONFECTIONERY UNION & INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND BOARD OF TRUSTEES and BAKERS UNION LOCAL NO. 57
Karsten Schuh, et al v. HCA Holdings, Inc.
as 16-5747
Plaintiff:
KARSTEN SCHUH, RAFAT KISHTAH and JULIUS DANIELS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEW ENGLAND TEAMSTERS & TRUCKING INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATHIS BISHOP and CATHERINE BISHOP
Defendant:
HCA HOLDINGS, INC.
In re: BancorpSouth, Inc., et al
as 16-505
Petitioner:
In re: BANCORPSOUTH, INC., JAMES D. ROLLINS, III, WILLIAM L. PRATER and others
Respondent:
WILLIAM E. BURGES, ROSE M. BURGES and CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS FIREFIGHTERS PENSION FUND
Operating Engineers Local 324, et al v. Glencorp, Incorporated, et al
as 16-1593
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 324 PENSION FUND, Trustees of, OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 324 HEALTH CARE PLAN, Trustees of, OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 324 VACATION AND HOLIDAY FUND, Trustees of and others
Defendant:
GLENCORP, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD A. MARINO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
