Cases 1 - 10 of 22
LaJeff Woodberry v. Daniel McDermott, et al
as 20-1612
Appellee:
MARK H. SHAPIRO, Chapter 7 Trustee and DANIEL M. MCDERMOTT, U.S. Trustee
Appellant:
LAJEFF LEE PERCY WOODBERRY
Debtor:
In re: LAJEFF LEE PERCY WOODBERRY
In re: Steven P. McDonald
as 20-8019
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN P. MCDONALD
Debtor:
In re: STEVEN P. MCDONALD
Interested Party:
CHRISTOPHER J. NIEKAMP and MARC P. GERTZ, Trustee
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DANIEL M. MCDERMOTT, United States Trustee for Region 9
In re: Joao Teixeira v. Andrew Vara, et al
as 20-3470
Appellant:
JOAO TEIXEIRA
Appellee:
DAVID O. SIMON, Chapter 7 Trustee, ANDREW R. VARA, United States Trustee for Region 9 and DANIEL M. MCDERMOTT, United States Trustee for Region 9
Debtor:
In re: JOAO TEIXEIRA
In re: Rodney Thomas Riddle
as 19-8022
Debtor:
In re: RODNEY RIDDLE
Appellant:
RODNEY RIDDLE
Appellee:
DANIEL M. MCDERMOTT, United States Trustee, Region 9 and MARK A. GREENBERGER, Trustee
In re: Rick St. George
as 16-8017
Debtor:
In re: RICK ST. GEORGE
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL M. MCDERMOTT
Defendant - Appellant:
RICK ST. GEORGE
Michael White v. Daniel McDermott, et al
as 16-1425
Debtor:
In re: MICHAEL B. WHITE and DARLA KAY WHITE, Deceased
Appellant:
MICHAEL B. WHITE
Appellee:
DANIEL M. MCDERMOTT, US Trustee, FRANKENMUTH CREDIT UNION and ALLY FINANCIAL INC.
Derrick Hills v. Daniel McDermott
as 16-1206
Debtor:
In re: TAMICA SHANTE GRISSETT
Appellant:
DERRICK HILLS
Appellee:
DANIEL M. MCDERMOTT, U.S. Trustee
Betty Taylor v. Daniel McDermott
as 15-1909
Debtor:
In re: BOBBIE J. FISHER
Appellant:
BETTY JUNE TAYLOR
Appellee:
DANIEL M. MCDERMOTT
Paulleto Rogers v. Daniel McDermott
as 15-1799
Debtor:
In re: PAULLETO ROGERS
Appellant:
PAULLETO ROGERS
Appellee:
DANIEL M. MCDERMOTT, Trustee
Daniel McDermott v. Betty Taylor
as 15-1052
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL M. MCDERMOTT
Defendant - Appellant:
BETTY JUNE TAYLOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
