Cases 41 - 50 of 337
Jimmy Sagastume-Hernandez v. Merrick Garland
as 21-4105
Petitioner:
JIMMY SAGASTUME-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Ivan Hernandez
as 21-1708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
IVAN HUERTA HERNANDEZ
Roxana Amaya-Hernandez v. Merrick Garland
as 21-3704
Petitioner:
ROXANA ELIZABETH AMAYA-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Rene Hernandez v. USA
as 21-5526
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
RENE DAVID HERNANDEZ
Hernandez Sebastian-Nicolas v. Merrick Garland
as 21-3670
Petitioner:
HERNANDEZ SEBASTIAN-NICOLAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Bruno Ramirez-Camela
as 21-1581
Defendant / Appellant:
BRUNO FREDDY RAMIREZ-CAMELA, aka Ismael Hernandez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Janet Malam, et al v. Rebecca Adducci, et al
as 21-1433
Defendant / Appellant:
CHAD F. WOLF, DHS Secretary, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
JANET MALAM
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RENE HERNANDEZ-VERGARA and SAMIR YOUSIF KADA
Steven Knapp v. Metro Govt of Nashville, et al
as 21-5219
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY WHITING, Official Capacity, METRO DEVELOPMENT & HOUSING AGENCY, et al., JAMES K. HARBISON, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN CHRISTOPHER KNAPP
Claribel Diaz-Hernandez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 21-3333
Petitioner:
CLARIBEL DEL ROSARIO DIAZ-HERNANDEZ, TANIA PRISCILA MELARA-DIAZ and NANCY IVETH MELARA-DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Janet Malam, et al v. Rebecca Adducci, et al
as 21-1146
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GUSTAVO SOTO VARGAS, LENCHE KRCOSKA, QAID ALHALMI and others
Respondent:
CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, ICE Deputy Director, ICE/DHS and others
Petitioner:
JANET MALAM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
