Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 177
Whirlpool Financial Corp, et al v. CIR We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1899
Petitioner / Appellant: CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES and WHIRLPOOL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Whirlpool Intl Holdings, et al v. CIR We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1900
Petitioner / Appellant: CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES and WHIRLPOOL INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, S.A.R.L., fka Maytag Corporation
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Michael Pinckard v. CIR
as 20-1742
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL DAVID PINCKARD
Alfred Campbell, III v. CIR
as 20-1007
Petitioner / Appellant: ALFRED Q. CAMPBELL, III
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Peter Hendrickson, et al v. CIR
as 19-2139
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Petitioner / Appellant: PETER E. HENDRICKSON and DOREEN M. HENDRICKSON
Walton Haddix v. CIR
as 19-1185
Petitioner / Appellant: WALTON RAY HADDIX
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Ronald Davenport v. CIR
as 19-1113
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Petitioner / Appellant: RONALD WAYNE DAVENPORT
Leslie Krehnbrink, et al v. CIR
as 19-1963
Petitioner / Appellant: ROBERT GRIFT KREHNBRINK and LESLIE RUPPERT KREHNBRINK
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Daniel Benham v. CIR
as 19-1938
Petitioner / Appellant: DANIEL D. BENHAM
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Hoffman Properties II, LP, et al v. CIR We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1831
Petitioner / Appellant: HOFFMAN PROPERTIES II, LP, Tax Matters Partner and FIVE M ACQ I, LLC, Tax Matters Partner
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?