Cases 31 - 40 of 241
Alexander Gifford v. Donald Trump, et al
as 21-1223
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, FBI Director, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President, ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, Former President
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER ROY GIFFORD
Abraham Escalante-Carrera v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-3214
Petitioner:
ABRAHAM ESCALANTE-CARRERA
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Francisca Hernandez-Hernandez, et al v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-3210
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
FRANCISCA HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ and A. L. H. H.
Daniel Molina-Martinez v. Merrick Garland
as 21-3201
Petitioner:
DANIEL FRANCISCO MOLINA-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Kevin Ruddock v. Merrick Garland
as 21-3194
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
KEVIN RICARDO RUDDOCK
Carmelina Lopez, et al v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-3198
Petitioner:
CARMELINA LOPEZ and KARLITA YARENSI ALFARO-LOPEZ
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Yolanda Ramos-Mejia, et al v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-3186
Petitioner:
NANCY DANIELY REYNOSO-RAMOS, ISAIAS ISAAC REYNOSO-RAMOS and YOLANDA RAMOS-MEJIA
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Juana Melchor Taperia v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-3187
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
JUANA MELCHOR TAPERIA
Cristobal Pateapa-Hernandez v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-3191
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
CRISTOBAL PATEAPA-HERNANDEZ
Iris Quevedo Canizales, et al v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-3183
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS SILVA QUEVEDO, CLAUDIA ROSMERY QUEVEDO CANIZALES and IRIS NOHELIA QUEVEDO CANIZALES
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
