Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Empl Ret Sys of St. Louis, et al v. Charles Jones, et al
as 23-3512
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Derivatively on behalf of FirstEnergy Corp., ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, LOCAL 103, I.B.E.W., Co-Lead Plaintiff - Case No. 2:20-cv-5128, MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS PENSION FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp. Case No. 2:20-cv-5237 and others
Appellant:
TODD AUGENBAUM
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES E. JONES, MICHAEL J. ANDERSON, STEVEN J. DEMETRIOU and others
Empls Ret Sys of St. Louis, et al v. Charles Jones, et al
as 21-3993
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Derivatively on behalf of FirstEnergy Corp., ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, LOCAL 103, I.B.E.W., Co-Lead Plaintiff - Case No. 2:20-cv-5128, MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS PENSION FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp. Case No. 2:20-cv-5237 and others
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JONES
Defendant / Appellant:
FIRSTENERGY CORP and FIRSTENERGY CORP.
Cynthia Pittman, et al v. Unum Group, et al
as 20-5710
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL J. WAXENBERG, JOHN F. MCGARRY, RICHARD P. MCKENNEY and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT CUNNINGHAM and CYNTHIA PITTMAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Not Classified By Court:
In re: UNUM GROUP SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CITY OF TAYLOR POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Lead Plaintiff
Pension Fund Group, et al v. Tempur-Pedic International, In, et al
as 14-5696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORFOLK COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, Designated Lead Plaintiff on 12/3/2012 per DE 66
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR BENNING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TEMPUR-PEDIC INTERNATIONAL, INC., MARK A. SARVARY and DALE E. WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
