Cases 1 - 10 of 1,398
Tenley Good v. BioLife Plasma Services, L.P., et al
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
TENLEY MCLAUGHLIN GOOD
Defendant:
BIOLIFE PLASMA SERVICES, L.P. and SHIRE US, INC., aka Shire Pharmaceuticals
Brian Fishback v. Warren County, KY Fiscal Court, et al
as 24-5379
Plaintiff:
BRIAN FISHBACK
Defendant:
WARREN COUNTY, KY FISCAL COURT, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF BOWLING GREEN, KY, ROBERT STIVERS, Kentucky State Senator and others
Monica Cherry v. Domino's Pizza LLC
as 24-1332
Plaintiff:
MONICA CHERRY
Defendant:
DOMINO'S PIZZA LLC
Paul Meola, et al v. Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity, Inc., et al
as 24-3305
Plaintiff:
PAUL MEOLA, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Chase Joseph Meola, deceased, and MARGARET MEOLA
Defendant:
PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY, INC., OHIO DELTA OF THE PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY and OHIO DELTA COMPANY
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs, et al
as 24-1310
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, aka P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and ATLANTIC RECORDS CORP.
John Doe v. Brian Spencer, et al
as 24-5251
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
BRIAN SPENCER and FICTITIOUS PERSONS 1-10
Jason Cunningham v. Shelby County, TN, et al
as 24-5241
Plaintiff:
JASON CUNNINGHAM, individually and as adult natural son and sole wrongful death beneficiary and next of kin, affiant and administrator ad litem and personal representative for Nancy Jane Lewellyn, Deceased, and Estate of Nancy Jane Lewellyn
Defendant:
SHELBY COUNTY, TN, SHERIFF WILLIAM OLDHAM, ROBERT PASCHAL, individually and in his official capacity as a Shelby County Sheriff's Deputy and others
Ronald Emrit v. Progressive Insurance Co., et al
as 24-3217
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CO. and STEPHANIE COURTNEY, p/k/a "Flo" from Progressive Insurance Co.
Timothy Davis v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
as 24-5210
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY EUGENE ELVIS DAVIS
Defendant:
SIG SAUER, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
