Cases 51 - 60 of 70
James Neuman v. United States Government, et al
as 11-1755
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES NEUMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, DEBBIE AGANS, Case Administrator at the Southern District Court, in her individual and official capacities, MINDY DUNCAN, Automation Support Specialist at the Southern District Court, in her individual and official capacities and others
David Blockowicz, et al v. Joseph Williams, et al
as 10-1167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BLOCKOWICZ, MARY BLOCKOWICZ and LISA BLOCKOWICZ
Defendant:
JOSEPH D. WILLIAMS and MICHELLE RAMEY
Appellee:
XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC
Barry Eppley, et al v. Arlene Mulley
as 10-3809
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BARRY EPPLEY, MD, Doctor
Appellant:
RICH BERGERON
Defendant:
ARLENE MULLEY
Bharat Barai v. Indian National Overseas Congr, et al
as 10-3368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BHARAT H. BARAI
Defendant - Appellee:
INDIAN NATIONAL OVERSEAS CONGRESS USA INC., SURINDRA MALHOTRA and SHELDON KARASIK
Barry Eppley, et al v. Lucille Iacovelli
as 10-3215
Plaintiff:
BARRY EPPLEY, MD, Doctor
Appellant:
RICH BERGERON
Defendant:
LUCILLE IACOVELLI
Gregg Moore v. U.S Postal Service in Oak Park, et al
as 10-1715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGG MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S POSTAL SERVICE IN OAK PARK AND RIVER FOREST, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID POPE and others
Barry Eppley, et al v. Lucille Iacovelli
as 10-1614
Plaintiff:
BARRY EPPLEY, MD, Doctor
Appellant:
RICH BERGERON
Defendant:
LUCILLE IACOVELLI
Joseph Kamelgard v. Jerzy Macura
as 09-1030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSEPH KAMELGARD, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
JERZY MACURA, M.D.
Joseph Kamelgard v. Jerzy Macura
as 08-4254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH KAMELGARD, M.D.
Defendant / Appellee:
JERZY MACURA, M.D.
Barry Eppley v. Lucille Iacovelli
as 09-4141
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BARRY EPPLEY, MD, Doctor
Defendant - Appellant:
LUCILLE IACOVELLI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
