Labor/Management Relations Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Gitanjali Kapila v. Diana Vallera, et al
as 24-1802
Plaintiff: GITANJALI KAPILA
Defendant: DIANA VALLERA, COLUMBIA FACULTY UNION and JOHN & JANE DOES
Mazen Agha, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 24-1749
Plaintiff: MAZEN HASAN AGHA, MICHAEL CRISSMAN, KEN ZUREK and others
Defendant: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Anthony Sullers, Sr. v. International Union Elevator Constructors, Local
as 24-1719
Plaintiff: ANTHONY B. SULLERS, SR.
Defendant: INTERNATIONAL UNION ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS, LOCAL 2
Sysco Indianapolis LLC v. Teamsters Local 135
as 23-1718
Plaintiff / Appellee: SYSCO INDIANAPOLIS LLC
Defendant / Appellant: TEAMSTERS LOCAL 135
Christine Boardman v. Service Employees International Union, et al
as 22-2957
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTINE BOARDMAN
Defendant / Appellee: SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, also known as SEIU, ELISEO MEDINA, DIAN PALMER, Individually and as Co-Trustee of SEIU Local 73 and others
Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. v. Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension, et al
as 22-1549
Plaintiff / Appellee: PENSKE TRUCK LEASING, LP
Defendant / Appellant: CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST & SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION PLAN, TRUSTEES OF CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND and CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION PLAN
Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. v. Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension, et al
as 22-1712
Plaintiff / Appellant: PENSKE TRUCK LEASING, LP
Defendant / Appellee: CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION PLAN and TRUSTEES OF CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND
United Natural Foods, Inc., et al v. Teamsters Local 414
as 22-1469
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC. and SUPERVALU INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellant: TEAMSTERS LOCAL 414

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?