Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Robert Kowalski v. USMS, et al
as 20-3482
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Petitioner:
ROBERT M. KOWALSKI
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Passport Agency, et al
as 20-2429
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM S. DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
William Davis, Jr. v. BOP, et al
as 20-2682
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM S. DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Department of S, et al
as 20-2237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM S. DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Antonio Cantu v. DOJ, et al
as 20-1772
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO CANTU, also known as TONY CANTU
Michael Rankins v. USA, et al
as 19-2417
Defendant / Appellee:
J. LAMPING, Safety Compliance Administrator, HUGH J. HURWITZ, Acting Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, ANDREW WHEELER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Antonio Crawford v. Matthew Kennelly, et al
as 19-1841
Defendant / Appellee:
M. MURPHY, UNKNOWN, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO D. CRAWFORD
Ronald Williams v. Richard Schott, et al
as 14-2375
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Respondent:
RICHARD W. SCHOTT, CLINT SWIFT, J. SIMMONS and others
Rudy Stanko v. Richard L. Young, et al
as 11-2372
Petitioner:
RUDY G. STANKO
Respondent:
RICHARD YOUNG, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES LOCKETT, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
