Cases 21 - 30 of 106
Randall Pavlock v. Eric Holcomb, et al
as 21-1599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDALL PAVLOCK, RAYMOND CAHNMAN and KIMBERLEY PAVLOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, CAMERON CLARK, CURTIS HILL and others
Patricia Clark v. Law Office of Terrence Kennedy
as 21-1319
Defendant / Appellee:
LAW OFFICE OF TERRENCE KENNEDY, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICIA CLARK
Gwendolyn Perry v. City of Harvey, et al
as 21-1228
Defendant / Appellee:
EDDIE WINTERS, Superintendent of Police of the City of Harvey, Mr. winters sued ln his official capacity as agent for The city of Harvey police Department, The Police Department agent of the city Harvey, CITY OF HARVEY, a municipal corporation Organized by virtue of the laws and existing under the statutes of the state of lllinois and CHRISTOPHER CLARK, Sued in his official Capacity as agent and elected mayor by citizen of The city of Harvey
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GWENDOLYN PERRY
USA v. Ernest Clark
as 21-1200
Defendant / Appellant:
ERNEST F. CLARK
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ian Clark v. Mark Sevier
as 20-3418
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK R. SEVIER, Superintendent
Petitioner / Appellant:
IAN J. CLARK
Tyler Kirk, et al v. Clark Equipment Company
as 20-2983
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELISSA KIRK and TYLER KIRK
Defendant / Appellee:
CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY, a corporation doing business as Bobcat Company
USA v. Heath Clark
as 20-2661
Defendant / Appellant:
HEATH B. CLARK
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sacorey Clark v. Nancy Rosenstengel
as 20-1788
Petitioner:
SACOREY CLARK
Respondent:
NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL
Ian Clark v. Mark Sevier
as 20-1544
Respondent:
MARK R. SEVIER, Superintendent
Petitioner:
IAN J. CLARK
Lamone Lauderdale v. John Layton, et al
as 20-1274
Defendant / Appellee:
DEVON CLARK, THOMAS WILLIAMS, JOHN R. LAYTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONE LAUDERDALE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
