Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Paul Klemp v. Franklin Collection Service, I
as 19-3522
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN COLLECTION SERVICE, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL KLEMP
Mary McKinney v. Franklin County Illinois, et al
as 19-3073
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN COUNTY ILLINOIS, LORI LITTLE, RANDALL CROCKER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY MCKINNEY, as Administrator for the Estate of R.E., Deceased
Carolyn Mascow, et al v. Board of Education of Frankli, et al
as 19-2563
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDY LAFLEUR, BOARD OF EDUCATION OF FRANKLIN PARK PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 84 and DAVID KATZIN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAROLYN MASCOW and ILLINOIS FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, Local 571
Ricky Franklin v. Express Text, LLC
as 19-2041
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY R. FRANKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
EXPRESS TEXT, LLC
Shanika Day, et al v. Franklin Wooten, et al
as 19-1972
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANIKA DAY, individualy, and as the Administrator for the ESTATE OF TERRELL DAY and HARVEY MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDALL DENNY and FRANKLIN WOOTEN, Sergeant
Shanika Day, et al v. Franklin Wooten, et al
as 19-1930
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHANIKA DAY, individualy, and as the Administrator for the ESTATE OF TERRELL DAY and HARVEY MORGAN
Defendant / Appellant:
RANDALL DENNY and FRANKLIN WOOTEN, Sergeant
Nino Franklin v. Steve Kallis
as 19-1758
Petitioner / Appellant:
NINO ALONZO FRANKLIN
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVE KALLIS, Warden
John Balsewicz v. Craig Blumer, et al
as 19-1619
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HELMEID, GERALD LENNOP, CRAIG BLUMER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN H. BALSEWICZ, also known as MELISSA BALSEWICZ
USA v. Franklin V. Fennell
as 18-1969
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANKLIN V. FENNELL
Ricky Franklin v. Express Text LLC
as 17-2807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY R. FRANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
EXPRESS TEXT LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
