Cases 1 - 10 of 12
USA v. Stacey Furlow
as 22-3203
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STACEY FURLOW
Stacey Sellner v. M. Segal
as 22-2112
Petitioner / Appellant:
STACEY SELLNER
Respondent / Appellee:
M. SEGAL, Warden
Devin Kugler v. Gregg Scott, et al
as 21-3199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVIN M. KUGLER
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGG SCOTT, JAMES MCCURRY, SHAN JUMPER and others
Logan Dyjak v. Jo-An Lynn, et al
as 21-3212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant / Appellee:
DANA WILKERSON, STACEY HORSTMAN, HARVEY DANIELS and others
Lamarr Crittenden v. Bruce Ippel, et al
as 20-3479
Defendant / Appellee:
BRUCE IPPEL, Doctor, HEATHER DAVIS, WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES OF INDIANA L.L.C and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMARR T. CRITTENDEN
Angela Tryon, et al v. Tony Reely, et al
as 20-1242
Defendant / Appellee:
TIM KEEFE, ROBERT LYNN, TONY REELY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
S. TRYON, disabled student by and through parent Angela Tryon, ANGELA TRYON and ALEX TRYON
Carlos Lindsey v. Stacey Hoem, et al
as 19-3278
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS LINDSEY
Defendant / Appellee:
STACEY HOEM, HEATHER SCHWENN, TORRIA VAN BUREN and others
Stacey Caudle v. DeKalb County State's Attorney, et al
as 19-1895
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY RADKE, CLINTON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY EMPLOYEES AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS, DEKALB COUNTY STATE'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STACEY A. CAUDLE
Stacey Mooney v. Illinois Education Associatio, et al
as 19-1774
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STACEY MOONEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CONGERVILLE-EUREKA-GOODFIELD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION and ILLINOIS EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
Home Depot U.S.A., Incorporate v. Michael Bauer, et al
as 16-8022
Petitioner:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED
Respondent:
MICHAEL BAUER and STACEY BAUER, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
