Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Home Depot, Inc. v. Zachary Corn
as 23-8003
Petitioner:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Respondent:
ZACHARY CORN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Christine Bryant v. Compass Group U.S.A., Inc.
as 20-1443
Defendant / Appellant:
COMPASS GROUP U.S.A., INCORPORATED
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTINE BRYANT, on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated, known and unknown,
Amicus Curiae:
MARY CRUMPTON
Lawrence Krivak v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 20-1276
Defendant / Appellee:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE KRIVAK
Compass Group U.S.A., Inc. v. Christine Bryant
as 20-8003
Petitioner:
COMPASS GROUP U.S.A., INCORPORATED
Respondent:
CHRISTINE BRYANT
Calvin Horne v. Electric Eel Manufacturing Com, et al
as 19-2082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN HORNE
Defendant / Appellee:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and ELECTRIC EEL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Stuart Rosenberg v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 19-1466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STUART ROSENBERG
Defendant / Appellee:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Native American Arts, Inc. v. Peter Stone Co., U.S.A., Inc.
as 16-4278
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIVE AMERICAN ARTS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
PETER STONE CO., U.S.A., INC.
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Home Depot U.S.A., Incorporate v. Michael Bauer, et al
as 16-8022
Petitioner:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED
Respondent:
MICHAEL BAUER and STACEY BAUER, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Native American Arts, Inc. v. Peter Stone Co., U.S.A., Inc.
as 15-2422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATIVE AMERICAN ARTS, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER STONE CO., U.S.A., INC.
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Whirlpool Corporation v. Amy St. Eve
as 09-3777
Petitioner:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
Respondent:
AMY J. ST. EVE
Party-in-Interest:
LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INCORPORATED, a subsidiary of LG Electronics, Incorporated. a Korean company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
