Cases 1 - 10 of 10
William White v. DOJ, et al
as 21-1229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Robert Kowalski v. USMS, et al
as 20-3511
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT M. KOWALSKI
Robert Kowalski v. USMS, et al
as 20-3482
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Petitioner:
ROBERT M. KOWALSKI
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Passport Agency, et al
as 20-2429
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM S. DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Melvin Bell v. USMS, et al
as 20-1580
Petitioner / Appellant:
MELVIN T. BELL
Respondent / Appellee:
R. A. HEISNER and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Melvin Bell v. USMS, et al
as 20-8008
Respondent:
R. A. HEISNER and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Petitioner:
MELVIN T. BELL
William J. Mabie v. USMS
as 18-2580
Petitioner:
WILLIAM J. MABIE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Oluwashina Ahmed-Al-Khalifa v. Richard Parsons, et al
as 13-3099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLUWASHINA KAZZEM AHMED-AL-KHALIFA
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD H. PARSONS, JONATHAN E. HAWLEY, SECRET SERVICE and others
Oluwashina Ahmed-Al-Khalifa v. Richard Parsons, et al
as 13-2587
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLUWASHINA KAZEEM AHMED-AL-KHALIFA
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD H. PARSONS, Federal Public Defender, JONATHAN E. HAWLEY, Federal Public Defender, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Corey Hines v. USMS, et al
as 09-8013
Petitioner:
COREY L. HINES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, KEITH A. KELLERMAN and DOUG CLARK, Major
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
