Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Paula Wallrich, et al v. Samsung Electronics America, Incorporated, et al
as 23-2842
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAULA WALLRICH, DANIELLE JONES, GRANT GRINNELL and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INCORPORATED and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LIMITED
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CONSUMER TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION and others
Stephanie Turner v. McDonald's USA LLC, et al
as 22-2334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHANIE TURNER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
MCDONALD'S USA LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and MCDONALD'S CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Roscoe Chambers v. Andrew Ciolli, et al
as 21-2764
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Respondent / Appellee:
ANDREW CIOLLI, Warden and D. GONZALEZ, JR.
Roscoe Chambers v. Andrew Ciolli, et al
as 21-2766
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Respondent / Appellee:
ANDREW CIOLLI, Warden and D. GONZALEZ, JR.
Roscoe Chambers v. Andrew Ciolli, et al
as 21-2765
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Respondent / Appellee:
ANDREW CIOLLI, Warden and D. GONZALEZ, JR.
Roscoe Chambers v. Andrew Ciolli
as 21-1484
Respondent / Appellee:
ANDREW CIOLLI, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Roscoe Chambers v. Andrew Ciolli
as 21-1486
Respondent / Appellee:
ANDREW CIOLLI, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Roscoe Chambers v. Andrew Ciolli
as 21-1485
Respondent / Appellee:
ANDREW CIOLLI, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Roscoe Chambers v. Chris Rivers
as 21-1396
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRIS RIVERS
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
USA v. Jeffrey Chambers
as 20-3168
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY DEAN CHAMBERS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
