Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Andrea Ratfield, et al v. United States Drug Testing Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 24-1858
Plaintiff:
ANDREA RATFIELD, ANN MARIE KELLY, BRIAN RAY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DRUG TESTING LABORATORIES, INC., DOUGLAS LEWIS and JOSEPH JONES
Patrick Jones, Jr. v. Lake County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 23-1769
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK JONES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and LAWRENCE OLIVER
Marvin Redford, et al v. Janssen Research & Development, et al
as 17-3200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN REDFORD, PAUL LEY, ROBERT KELLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC, formerly known as Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC, BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INCORPORATED, JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC and others
Semmie Jones v. Leslie Lester, et al
as 16-3445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEMMIE JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
LESLIE LESTER, individually and as employee/agent of the municipal division, first district, of the circuit court of cook county, illinois, JAMES J. CONLON, Attorney, agent and assistant to presiding judge of the municipal division, first district, of the circuit court of cook county, illinois, VILLAGE OF RIVER FOREST, a municipal corporation and others
Naweed Love v. P.E. Jones, et al
as 13-3702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAWEED S. LOVE
Defendant - Appellee:
P.E. JONES, Texas State Police and ILLINOIS STATE POLICE
Roger Jones v. USA, et al
as 13-2336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Estate of Nicholas D. Rice v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
as 10-2389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF NICHOLAS D. RICE, Deceased, by Rick D. Rice and Diane J. Waldrop Co-Personal Representatives
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, REBBECA HESS, SHARRONE JONES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
