Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Otis Johnson v. Brittany Greene
as 21-2998
Petitioner / Appellant:
OTIS JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
BRITTANY GREENE, Warden
Jill Otis v. Lisa Manske, et al
as 21-2758
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JILL OTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA MANSKE and LORI SALEY
Otis Dawson v. Steven Johnson, et al
as 20-3184
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN A. CARR, TONY EVERS and STEVEN JOHNSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OTIS DAWSON
Jill Otis v. Kayla Demarasse
as 20-3111
Defendant / Appellee:
KAYLA J. DEMARASSE, Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JILL OTIS
Otis Elion v. USA
as 20-1725
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
OTIS R. ELION
Jill Otis v. Kayla Demarasse
as 20-1333
Defendant / Appellee:
KAYLA J. DEMARASSE, Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JILL OTIS
Ashoor Rasho, et al v. John Baldwin, et al
as 19-1978
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OTIS ARRINGTON, PATRICE DANIELS, ASHOOR RASHO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN R. BALDWIN, Acting Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, MELVIN HINTON, Chief of Mental Health Services and Addiction Recovery Servicse for the Illinois Department of Corrections and JOHN BALDWIN, Acting Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections
Ryan Holl v. Otis R Bowen Center for Human
as 19-1509
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN A. HOLL
Defendant / Appellee:
OTIS R BOWEN CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES, INC.
Ashoor Rasho, et al v. John Baldwin, et al
as 19-1375
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OTIS ARRINGTON, PATRICE DANIELS, ASHOOR RASHO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MELVIN HINTON and JOHN R. BALDWIN, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections
Ashoor Rasho, et al v. John Baldwin, et al
as 19-1145
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OTIS ARRINGTON, PATRICE DANIELS, ASHOOR RASHO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN R. BALDWIN, Acting Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections and MELVIN HINTON, Chief of Mental Health Services and Addiction Recovery Servicse for the Illinois Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
